Cryptocurrency funding hits $3.5B in a week

Cryptocurrency funding hits $3.5B

COIN4U IN YOUR SOCIAL FEED

The last seven days have been a watershed moment for digital assets. Cryptocurrency funding—spanning venture capital rounds, token issuances, strategic investments, and project treasuries—surged to an unprecedented $3.5 billion in a single week. The magnitude of that figure signals more than just market euphoria. It reflects a structural shift in how capital allocators perceive blockchain startups, Web3 infrastructure, and the broader digital asset ecosystem. As institutional rails deepen and regulatory clarity inches forward in key jurisdictions, investors aren’t merely returning to crypto; they’re funding it with conviction.

This article unpacks the drivers behind the record-setting week, the categories that pulled in the most cash, and the ripple effects for founders, developers, and investors. You’ll find a clear narrative across decentralized finance (DeFi), Layer-2 scaling, real-world assets (RWA) tokenization, stablecoins, and crypto exchanges, along with how macro forces—from exchange-traded products to a hot AI cycle—are cross-pollinating crypto innovation. For context, market data trackers such as DeFiLlama’s Raises dashboard and weekly digital-asset flow reports point to unprecedented multi-billion-dollar inflows that help frame this week’s momentum in a longer uptrend.

Why $3.5B in a week matters now

The headline number is not just a curiosity for deal trackers. It is evidence that liquidity conditions in digital assets are improving at multiple layers of the stack. On one end, primary markets—private venture rounds and token pre-sales—are back to writing large checks. On the other hand, secondary-market demand via crypto ETPs and ETFs is driving usage, valuations, and treasury runway. In early October 2025, for example, CoinShares reported the largest weekly inflow on record for global crypto ETFs, nearly $6 billion in a single week—a context that illuminates why founders can raise bigger rounds at better terms when public-market demand is robust.

Importantly, this time the capital is more diversified. Rather than a narrow focus on speculative trading or short-term narratives, funding is spreading across infrastructure, security, payments, RWA tokenization, and developer tooling. That breadth is crucial; it reduces sector fragility and helps sustain adoption through different market cycles. Data aggregators like DeFiLlama show a steadily thickening pipeline of raises across verticals, which aligns with the scale seen this week.

The macro forces powering a record week

The macro forces powering a record week

ETF adoption and institutional rails

ETF inflows don’t directly equal startup funding, but they catalyze it. When exchange-traded products absorb billions of dollars in a week, liquidity improves, volatility often compresses, and equity investors become more comfortable underwriting crypto infrastructure plays that monetize the growing base—custody, market data, compliance, and order-routing among them. The week that saw nearly $6B flow into crypto ETFs captures this mechanism perfectly: abundant secondary-market demand paves the way for primary-market risk-taking.

Regulatory clarification and risk normalization

Multiple jurisdictions have accelerated licensing regimes for virtual asset service providers (VASPs), while guidance around stablecoin issuance and tokenized securities continues to mature. This doesn’t make risk disappear, but it does translate to clearer compliance roadmaps for startups and more predictable risk models for funds. As compliance infrastructure improves, cryptocurrency funding tends to accelerate because capital can be deployed with fewer unknowns.

AI-crypto convergence

Another tailwind is the co-evolution of AI and blockchain. Projects at the intersection—decentralized compute, AI model marketplaces, privacy-preserving ML, and verifiable inference—are raising larger rounds, often with crossover AI funds joining traditional crypto VCs. This capital stack encourages hybrid architectures where blockchains provide provenance, payments, and data rights, while AI drives user-facing utility.

Where the money went: categories that thrived

Layer-2 scaling and modular infrastructure

Transaction throughput and fees remain make-or-break for mainstream adoption. Layer-2 ecosystems (rollups, validiums, and app-specific chains) continue to attract investment for sequencers, data availability layers, and cross-chain messaging. This week’s funding binge highlights a preference for modular stacks: projects that let developers assemble execution, settlement, and data availability as independent components. The result is a developer experience closer to cloud-native microservices, but for blockchains.

Real-world assets, stablecoins, and on-chain treasuries

Tokenized real-world assets (RWA)—from short-term T-bills to private credit—have leapt from concept to product-market fit. As yields normalize and on-chain settlement proves efficient, investors are backing platforms that tokenize, custody, and service these instruments compliantly. Stablecoin infrastructure (issuers, payment gateways, on/off-ramps, and compliance tooling) also drew meaningful allocations because it forms the transactional bedrock of Web3 commerce.

DeFi protocols with durable cash flows

Smart money is discriminating among DeFi protocols, prioritizing those with real revenues and strong fee capture. Allocators are rewarding protocols that have diversified fee sources (spot DEX, perps, lending, and structured products) and robust risk management. This week’s deals reflect that bias, with valuation frameworks referencing protocol revenue, fee share to tokenholders, and user retention metrics rather than only TVL.

Security, audits, and compliance

After years of costly exploits, security is now a funding magnet. Auditors, formal verification platforms, threat-intelligence networks, and post-incident recovery tooling secured larger checks. The thesis is straightforward: as more value migrates on-chain, high-assurance security becomes a foundational moat.

Wallets, identity, and payments UX

Consumer-facing adoption hinges on wallet usability and account abstraction. Investors are backing products that collapse the cognitive overhead of seed phrases, improve social recovery, and enable passkey-based experiences. Payment companies integrating stablecoins at the point of sale or in cross-border corridors are also drawing capital, thanks to clear revenue paths and expanding regulatory comfort.

How does this wave differ from the last cycle

Quality over quantity in deal flow

During the 2021 frenzy, deal velocity was extreme, and diligence windows were short. In contrast, the current wave is more methodical. Cryptocurrency funding is setting records in aggregate, but individual rounds are anchored by stronger metrics: audited codebases, clear token economics, real users, and multi-quarter retention. Founders who can show sustainable unit economics and credible paths to mainstream distribution command a premium.

A healthier feedback loop between public and private markets

Public-market demand, as signaled by ETF flows and listed crypto equities, is acting as a barometer for private valuation sanity. Weeks with record ETF inflows have coincided with tighter spreads, higher liquidity, and a read-through to better fundraising conditions for startups building the picks-and-shovels of the space. The synergy is visible in the data and commentary around the record ETF week.

Broader institutional participation

Crossover funds, corporate venture arms, payment giants, cloud providers, and even traditional exchanges are participating more frequently. Whether they co-lead rounds or provide strategic capacity (compute credits, distribution, or compliance tooling), these players compress the build-measure-learn cycle for startups and lower the cost of scale.

What should founders do next?

Nail compliance and risk from day one

Investors increasingly expect a compliance memo alongside your pitch deck, not as an afterthought. Prepare mappings for KYC/KYB, sanctions screening, travel rule obligations, and data-retention policies. For protocols, show auditor relationships, bug bounty coverage, and real-time monitoring.

Embrace modularity and composability.y

Design for a multi-chain world. Architect your product to be chain-agnostic, with clear interfaces for messaging, bridging, and custody. Investors reward teams that can expand into ecosystems where user growth is fastest without rewriting core code.

Demonstrate real cash flows and defensibility.ty.

Even if your token is years away, highlight fee generation, customer concentration, and churn. Where applicable, show defensibility via network effects, cryptographic moats (proofs), or capital moats (treasury, governance). DeFi founders can bolster narratives with transparent dashboards and proof-of-reserves.

How investors can allocate too the surge

Separate cyclical from structural

Treat ETF-driven liquidity as a cyclical accelerant, not the sole thesis. The structural drivers—RWA tokenization, payments, security, and developer infra—are where capital compounds. Use weeks like this to increase exposure to teams with demonstrable traction rather than chase late-stage momentum. That framework aligns with aggregated raise trackers showing steady deal breadth beneath headline spikes.

Build a barbell across risk profiles.

Balance yield-bearing RWA and stablecoin infrastructure on one end with selective Layer-2 and privacy bets on the other. This captures cash-flow resilience while preserving upside from breakthrough protocols.

Underwrite governance and token design, Nearall.y

High-quality token economics—sensible emissions, utility tied to real services, and credible buyback or fee-share mechanisms—now drive valuation more than ever. Insist on clear governance roadmaps and vesting schedules to avoid mercenary flows.

Signals to monitor after the record week

Sustainability of ETF and ETP flows

If ETF inflows remain strong in the coming weeks, expect private rounds to keep clearing at healthy marks. Watch for rolling 4-week totals and compare to prior peaks—this is an easy, timely read of broader demand. The latest record-setting ETF week gives a baseline for what “strong” looks like.

Developer activity and on-chain usage

Check monthly active developers, GitHub repos, and on-chain metrics like gas consumption, unique addresses, and protocol revenue. Healthy fundamentals indicate funding isn’t just chasing price but underwriting utility.

Stablecoin velocity and settlement

Growth in stablecoin supply and transactional velocity across exchanges and merchant networks is an excellent proxy for on-chain economic activity. It also strengthens the investment case for payments and compliance rails.

Risks that could derail the momentum

Risks that could derail the momentum

Policy shocks and enforcement actions

A single adverse ruling or high-profile enforcement action can chill deal flow quickly. Teams should maintain legal contingency plans s and investors should diversify across jurisdictions.

Security incidents

A major exploit—especially in a cross-chain bridge or leading DeFi primitive—could reset risk appetite. This is precisely why security platforms and formal verification shops are drawing larger checks.

Liquidity crunch in risk assets

A global risk-off event that drains liquidity from equities and high-yield credit could compress crypto valuations and slow private capital deployment. Barbelling balance sheets and maintaining ng longer runway help weather macro swings.

See More: Best Cryptocurrency Exchange for Beginners Complete 2025 Guide

Conculsion

A single week of $3.5 billion in cryptocurrency funding is more than a headline—it’s a signal that crypto has re-entered a capital formation phase where institutional and retail flows reinforce one another. ETF inflows are supplying liquidity and confidence; venture and strategic investors are channeling that confidence into the builders of tomorrow’s financial and internet infrastructure. From Layer-2 throughput and RWA settlement to stablecoin payments and DeFi revenue, the mosaic points to a maturing market that funds utility as eagerly as it funds narratives. Trackers like DeFiLlama’s Raises and weekly fund-flow reports provide the receipts for this momentum and suggest the pipeline remains robust.

FAQs

Q: What exactly counts toward the $3.5B weekly total?

“Funding” here encompasses private venture rounds (seed to late stage), token sales or pre-launch allocations, strategic corporate investments, and ecosystem grants or treasury infusions that materially expand a project’s runway. While ETF and ETP flows don’t count as startup funding, they meaningfully influence startup fundraising conditions by improving overall market liquidity, which is why they’re relevant context when evaluating a record week.

Q: Is this surge just hype, or is it backed by fundamentals?

The surge coincides with strong institutional participation through regulated products and with diversified investment across infrastructure, RWA, security, and payments. Funding trackers show a broad base of raises across categories rather than a narrow, momentum-led spike, suggesting improving fundamentals beneath the headline number.

Q: Which sectors are getting the largest checks?

This cycle is rewarding Layer-2 and modular infrastructure providers, RWA platforms, and stablecoin rails, auditable DeFi protocols with fee capture, and security tooling. Consumer-facing wallets with account abstraction and seamless recovery also attract capital thanks to their direct impact on onboarding.

Q: How should founders adapt their fundraising strategies?

Lead with compliance readiness and security posture, then show real usage and unit economics. Design modular, chain-agnostic products and present clear token-economy plans—even if the token is far off. Investors are prioritizing transparent metrics, audited code, and credible paths to revenue.

Q: What indicators should investors watch to judge if momentum will last?

Monitor rolling ETF inflows, monthly developer activity, on-chain fee and revenue growth, and stablecoin velocity. If those indicators stay firm, the primary market should remain constructive for cryptocurrency funding, even if price volatility returns. For high-frequency context, weekly ETF flow data has become a reliable barometer of broader demand.

Explore more articles like this

Subscribe to the Finance Redefined newsletter

A weekly toolkit that breaks down the latest DeFi developments, offers sharp analysis, and uncovers new financial opportunities to help you make smart decisions with confidence. Delivered every Friday

By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Services and Privacy Policy

READ MORE

New York City bets on blockchain, a technology most have discarded as useless

New York City

COIN4U IN YOUR SOCIAL FEED

For much of the past decade, blockchain technology has lived through cycles of hype, disillusionment, and skepticism. Once hailed as a revolutionary force capable of reshaping finance, governance, and the internet itself, it has more recently been dismissed by critics as inefficient, overhyped, or even useless. High-profile project failures, volatile cryptocurrency markets, and regulatory uncertainty have contributed to a growing narrative that blockchain has failed to live up to its early promises. Yet, in the midst of this widespread doubt, New York City bets on blockchain, positioning itself against the prevailing sentiment and signaling a long-term commitment to digital infrastructure and innovation.

New York City’s decision is not merely symbolic. As one of the world’s leading financial, technological, and cultural hubs, the city’s stance on emerging technologies often sets a precedent for other global centers. By choosing to explore blockchain applications in public services, finance, data security, and economic development, New York City is effectively challenging the idea that blockchain is obsolete. Instead, it suggests that the technology’s most meaningful applications may only now be coming into focus.

This article explores why New York City bets on blockchain at a time when many have written it off, what this move means for the future of urban governance and innovation, and how blockchain could still prove its relevance beyond speculative cryptocurrency markets. By examining the city’s motivations, potential use cases, challenges, and broader implications, we can better understand whether blockchain is truly a discarded technology or simply one that is evolving into a more mature and practical form.

Why Blockchain Was Labeled as Useless

The Collapse of Early Expectations

Blockchain’s reputation problem stems largely from the gap between its early promises and real-world outcomes. In its early years, blockchain was portrayed as a solution for everything from global payments and digital identity to supply chains and voting systems. These sweeping claims created unrealistic expectations. When many projects failed to deliver scalable, user-friendly solutions, disappointment set in. As a result, the idea that blockchain could transform society began to lose credibility.

The collapse of several high-profile cryptocurrency platforms further reinforced the belief that blockchain was fundamentally flawed. Critics argued that if the most visible applications of blockchain could not maintain stability or trust, then the underlying technology itself must be inadequate. This sentiment gained traction in mainstream media, where blockchain was increasingly associated with speculation rather than innovation.

Energy Consumption and Environmental Concerns

Another major reason blockchain was discarded as useless lies in its environmental impact. Certain blockchain networks, particularly those relying on energy-intensive consensus mechanisms, were criticized for their high electricity consumption. Environmental advocates questioned whether a technology with such a large carbon footprint could be justified, especially when its benefits seemed abstract or limited to financial speculation.

These concerns became a powerful argument against blockchain adoption, especially for governments and public institutions aiming to meet sustainability goals. The perception that blockchain was inherently wasteful overshadowed ongoing improvements in energy efficiency and alternative consensus models, contributing to the narrative that it was a technological dead end.

Regulatory Uncertainty and Public Distrust

New York City bets

Regulatory confusion also played a significant role in blockchain’s decline in reputation. Governments around the world struggled to classify and regulate blockchain-based assets and services. This uncertainty created legal risks for businesses and discouraged large-scale adoption. At the same time, public distrust grew as scams, fraud, and poorly managed projects dominated headlines.

Against this backdrop, it is understandable why many concluded that blockchain was more trouble than it was worth. Yet, despite these challenges, New York City bets on blockchain, suggesting that the technology’s failures may be less about its core principles and more about how it has been implemented so far.

Why New York City Is Taking a Different View

A Strategic Vision for Digital Infrastructure

New York City’s interest in blockchain reflects a broader strategy focused on modernizing digital infrastructure. As cities become more data-driven, the need for secure, transparent, and resilient systems grows. Blockchain, at its core, offers a decentralized way to record and verify information, making it attractive for applications beyond cryptocurrency.

By investing in blockchain research and pilot programs, the city is signaling that it sees long-term value in the technology’s foundational features rather than its speculative uses. New York City bets on blockchain not because it ignores past failures, but because it believes the technology can evolve into a practical tool for urban management and economic growth.

Reinforcing Its Role as a Global Financial Hub

As a global financial capital, New York City cannot afford to ignore technological shifts that could reshape finance. While many financial institutions have grown cautious about public blockchain networks, they continue to explore private and permissioned blockchains for settlement, compliance, and data sharing. By supporting blockchain innovation, the city aims to remain at the forefront of financial technology rather than reacting to changes after they occur.

This proactive stance helps attract startups, researchers, and investors who are still committed to blockchain’s potential. In this sense, New York City bets on blockchain as a way to maintain its competitive edge in a rapidly evolving global economy.

Embracing Innovation Despite Skepticism

New York City has a long history of adopting new technologies before they are universally accepted. From financial engineering to digital media, the city has often served as a testing ground for innovations that later became mainstream. Betting on blockchain fits this pattern. Even if the technology is currently unfashionable, the city recognizes that innovation often requires patience and a willingness to experiment.

This willingness to look beyond short-term trends is what sets New York City apart. Rather than following the crowd in dismissing blockchain, it is choosing to explore how the technology might be refined and repurposed to address real-world challenges.

Practical Blockchain Use Cases for a Modern City

Public Records and Data Integrity

One of the most promising areas where blockchain could add value is in managing public records. Cities handle vast amounts of data related to property ownership, permits, licenses, and legal documents. Ensuring the integrity and transparency of these records is critical for public trust. Blockchain’s ability to create tamper-resistant records makes it well-suited for this purpose.

By experimenting with blockchain-based record systems, New York City could reduce fraud, streamline administrative processes, and improve accessibility for residents. This approach highlights how New York City bets on blockchain not as a buzzword, but as a tool for improving governance.

Digital Identity and Citizen Services

Digital identity is another area where blockchain could play a transformative role. Secure and verifiable digital identities could simplify access to city services, reduce paperwork, and enhance privacy protections. Instead of relying on centralized databases that are vulnerable to breaches, blockchain-based systems could give individuals greater control over their personal information.

For a city as large and diverse as New York, improving the efficiency of citizen services is a constant challenge. Blockchain offers a potential pathway to more inclusive and secure digital interactions between residents and government agencies.

Supply Chain Transparency and Urban Logistics

Urban supply chains are complex, involving countless stakeholders and transactions. Blockchain can provide end-to-end visibility into these processes, helping cities track goods, verify compliance, and respond more effectively to disruptions. This capability became especially relevant during global supply chain crises, when transparency and coordination were in short supply.

By applying blockchain to logistics and procurement, New York City could improve efficiency and accountability while supporting local businesses. This practical focus underscores why New York City bets on blockchain even as others question its relevance.

Economic Implications of New York City’s Blockchain Bet

Attracting Talent and Investment

When a major city publicly supports an emerging technology, it sends a strong signal to the market. Entrepreneurs and investors often follow such signals, viewing them as indicators of future opportunities. By embracing blockchain, New York City positions itself as a hub for blockchain innovation, attracting skilled professionals who might otherwise look elsewhere.

This influx of talent can have a multiplier effect, fostering collaboration between startups, universities, and established companies. Over time, this ecosystem can generate new jobs and economic growth, even if blockchain itself remains a niche technology.

Supporting a Broader Tech Ecosystem

Blockchain does not exist in isolation. It intersects with fields such as artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and data analytics. By investing in blockchain initiatives, New York City indirectly strengthens its broader technology ecosystem. Research and development in one area often lead to breakthroughs in others, creating a virtuous cycle of innovation.

This holistic approach to technology policy explains why New York City bets on blockchain despite its controversial reputation. The city is not wagering everything on a single technology, but rather exploring how blockchain fits into a larger digital strategy.

Long-Term Competitiveness

Cities compete globally for investment, talent, and influence. Those that fail to adapt to technological change risk falling behind. While blockchain may not dominate headlines as it once did, its underlying concepts of decentralization and cryptographic security continue to influence new systems and platforms.

By staying engaged with blockchain’s evolution, New York City ensures it remains adaptable and competitive in the long run. This forward-looking mindset is essential in a world where technological relevance can shift rapidly.

Addressing the Criticisms Head-On

Scalability and Performance Improvements

One of the most common criticisms of blockchain is its limited scalability. Early networks struggled to handle large volumes of transactions efficiently, reinforcing the idea that blockchain was impractical for large-scale use. However, ongoing research has led to significant improvements in performance, including more efficient consensus mechanisms and layered architectures.

New York City’s approach acknowledges these limitations while recognizing that technology evolves over time. By supporting experimentation and pilot projects, the city can evaluate whether newer blockchain solutions are capable of meeting real-world demands.

Environmental Sustainability

Environmental concerns remain a serious challenge for blockchain adoption. Yet, not all blockchain systems are equally energy-intensive. Many newer platforms prioritize sustainability, using consensus methods that dramatically reduce energy consumption. By focusing on these alternatives, New York City can align blockchain initiatives with its environmental goals.

This nuanced approach demonstrates that New York City bets on blockchain with a clear understanding of its drawbacks and a commitment to responsible implementation.

Rebuilding Public Trust

Public skepticism toward blockchain is rooted in years of negative headlines. To overcome this distrust, transparency and education are essential. By communicating clearly about its blockchain initiatives and focusing on tangible benefits rather than hype, New York City can help reshape public perception. When residents see blockchain being used to improve services rather than fuel speculation, trust can gradually be restored. This shift in narrative is crucial for any meaningful adoption.

The Broader Significance of New York City’s Decision

technology

Setting an Example for Other Cities

As a global city, New York’s policy choices often influence others. When New York City bets on blockchain, it challenges other municipalities to reconsider their own assumptions about the technology. Even cities that remain skeptical may feel compelled to explore blockchain more seriously rather than dismissing it outright. This ripple effect could lead to more thoughtful and selective adoption of blockchain worldwide, focusing on practical use cases rather than speculative trends.

Redefining Blockchain’s Role

New York City’s stance helps redefine what blockchain is for. Instead of being viewed primarily as a vehicle for cryptocurrency speculation, blockchain can be repositioned as a foundational technology for secure data management and digital trust. This reframing is essential if blockchain is to move beyond its troubled past. By emphasizing utility over hype, New York City bets on blockchain as a mature technology rather than a get-rich-quick scheme.

A Test Case for the Future

Ultimately, New York City’s blockchain initiatives serve as a real-world test case. If successful, they could demonstrate that blockchain still has a role to play in modern society. If they fail, they will provide valuable lessons about the technology’s limitations. Either way, the city’s willingness to experiment contributes to a more informed and balanced understanding of blockchain’s potential.

Conclusion

The decision that New York City bets on blockchain at a time when many have written it off is both bold and pragmatic. Rather than embracing the technology blindly or rejecting it outright, the city is taking a measured approach that focuses on practical applications, long-term strategy, and responsible innovation. By looking beyond the hype and the failures of the past, New York City is exploring whether blockchain’s core principles can still deliver value in areas such as public administration, digital identity, and economic development.

This bet is not without risks. Blockchain still faces challenges related to scalability, sustainability, and public trust. However, New York City’s willingness to confront these issues head-on suggests a level of maturity often missing from earlier adoption efforts. In doing so, the city is not just betting on blockchain, but on its own ability to shape technology in service of public good.

Whether blockchain ultimately proves its worth or fades into obscurity, New York City’s experiment will play a crucial role in determining its future. In an era defined by rapid technological change, the city’s choice to engage rather than dismiss may turn out to be its most valuable investment.

FAQs

Q: Why does New York City believe blockchain is still worth exploring?

New York City believes blockchain is worth exploring because its core features, such as data integrity, transparency, and decentralization, can address real-world challenges in governance and digital infrastructure. While many early projects failed, the city sees potential in refined and more focused applications that go beyond speculation.

Q: How is New York City’s approach to blockchain different from past hype cycles?

Unlike earlier hype-driven adoption, New York City’s approach emphasizes practical use cases, pilot programs, and long-term evaluation. The city is not promoting blockchain as a cure-all but as a tool that may complement existing systems when applied thoughtfully.

Q: Does New York City’s blockchain bet focus on cryptocurrencies?

No, the city’s interest in blockchain extends beyond cryptocurrencies. While digital assets are part of the broader ecosystem, the primary focus is on blockchain as a technology for secure records, digital identity, and efficient public services rather than price speculation.

Q: Can blockchain really improve city services for residents?

Blockchain has the potential to improve city services by making data more secure, transparent, and accessible. For residents, this could mean faster processes, reduced fraud, and greater trust in public records, provided the technology is implemented responsibly.

Q: What risks does New York City face by betting on blockchain?

The risks include technological limitations, public skepticism, and the possibility that blockchain solutions may not outperform existing systems. However, by starting with small-scale experiments and continuous evaluation, New York City aims to manage these risks while exploring potential benefits.

Explore more articles like this

Subscribe to the Finance Redefined newsletter

A weekly toolkit that breaks down the latest DeFi developments, offers sharp analysis, and uncovers new financial opportunities to help you make smart decisions with confidence. Delivered every Friday

By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Services and Privacy Policy

READ MORE

ADD PLACEHOLDER