Muhammad Kashif

August 12, 2025

Best Cryptocurrency Courses Online 2025

COIN4U IN YOUR SOCIAL FEED

The digital currency revolution continues to reshape the global financial landscape, and finding the best cryptocurrency courses online in 2025 has become crucial for anyone looking to participate in this transformative industry. Whether you’re a complete beginner seeking foundational knowledge or an experienced investor wanting to deepen your understanding, the right educational platform can accelerate your journey into the world of digital assets. With blockchain technology evolving rapidly and new cryptocurrencies emerging regularly, staying updated through quality education has never been more critical. This comprehensive guide examines the top-rated cryptocurrency learning platforms, helping you make an informed decision about your crypto education investment.

Why Cryptocurrency Education Matters in 2025

The cryptocurrency market has matured significantly since Bitcoin’s inception, evolving from a niche technology into a mainstream financial instrument. As institutional adoption accelerates and regulatory frameworks solidify, understanding cryptocurrency fundamentals becomes essential for modern investors and professionals.

Educational platforms have responded to this growing demand by developing comprehensive curricula that cover everything from basic blockchain concepts to advanced trading strategies. The complexity of decentralised finance (DeFi), non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and emerging consensus mechanisms necessitates structured learning approaches, which only quality courses can provide.

Professional credentials in cryptocurrency and blockchain technology are increasingly valuable in today’s job market. Many Fortune 500 companies now seek employees with verified crypto knowledge, making certification programs more relevant than ever before.

Best Cryptocurrency Courses Online 2025: Top Platform Reviews

Coursera’s Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Technology Specialisation

Coursera partners with leading universities to offer accredited cryptocurrency courses that combine academic rigour with practical applications. Their specialisation programs typically span 4-6 months and include hands-on projects that reinforce theoretical concepts.

The platform’s strength lies in its university partnerships, particularly with Princeton University and the University of Pennsylvania, which provide credible backing for their cryptocurrency curricula. Students receive certificates upon completion, adding valuable credentials to their professional profiles.

Interactive assignments and peer review systems create engaging learning environments where students can collaborate and learn from diverse perspectives. The courses cover fundamental concepts like cryptographic hashing, consensus algorithms, and innovative contract development.

Udemy’s Comprehensive Crypto Course Collection

Udemy hosts thousands of cryptocurrency courses ranging from beginner-friendly introductions to advanced technical deep-dives. The platform’s strength lies in its diverse instructor base, which includes industry practitioners, academic experts, and successful traders.

Popular courses on Udemy often feature lifetime access policies, allowing students to revisit material as the cryptocurrency landscape evolves. This flexibility proves invaluable given the rapid pace of innovation in blockchain technology.

The platform’s rating system helps identify high-quality content, with top-rated courses receiving thousands of positive reviews from satisfied students. Course prices remain affordable, with frequent sales making quality education accessible to broader audiences.

Binance Academy’s Free Educational Resources

Binance Academy stands out by offering completely free cryptocurrency education through one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges. Their content covers beginner concepts through advanced trading strategies, making it suitable for learners at all levels.

The academy’s strength lies in real-world relevance, as content creators understand practical cryptocurrency applications from daily exchange operations. Articles, videos, and interactive quizzes provide multiple learning formats to accommodate different learning preferences.

Regular updates ensure content remains current with market developments and regulatory changes. The platform’s glossary section serves as an excellent reference tool for understanding crypto terminology and concepts.

LinkedIn Learning’s Professional Development Focus

LinkedIn Learning approaches cryptocurrency education from a professional development perspective, emphasising career applications and business implications of blockchain technology. Their courses often focus on how cryptocurrency impacts various industries and business models.

The platform’s integration with LinkedIn profiles allows learners to showcase completed courses directly on their professional networks. This visibility can attract potential employers and business partners interested in blockchain expertise.

Course quality remains consistently high due to LinkedIn’s rigorous instructor vetting process. Professional instructors bring real-world experience and business acumen to their teaching approaches.

edX’s University-Level Cryptocurrency Programs

edX collaborates with prestigious universities to offer university-level cryptocurrency and blockchain courses. MIT, Harvard, and other top institutions contribute to their course catalogue, ensuring academic excellence and cutting-edge content.

The platform offers both free audit options and paid verified certificates, making quality education accessible while providing credentialing options for serious learners. Course structures mirror traditional university formats with assignments, exams, and grading systems.

Research-based approaches characterise edX courses, often incorporating the latest academic research and industry studies. This scholarly perspective provides deep theoretical foundations that complement practical applications.

Essential Topics Covered in Top Cryptocurrency Courses

Blockchain Fundamentals and Technology

Understanding blockchain technology forms the foundation of cryptocurrency education. Quality courses explain distributed ledger concepts, cryptographic principles, and consensus mechanisms in accessible terms while maintaining technical accuracy.

Students learn about different blockchain architectures, including public, private, and consortium networks. Hash functions, digital signatures, and Merkle trees receive detailed coverage as fundamental building blocks of secure blockchain systems.

Practical exercises often include setting up blockchain nodes, exploring block explorers, and understanding transaction verification processes. These hands-on activities reinforce theoretical concepts through direct experience.

Cryptocurrency Trading and Investment Strategies

Professional trading education covers technical analysis, fundamental analysis, and risk management principles specific to cryptocurrency markets. Students learn to read price charts, identify market trends, and execute profitable trading strategies.

Portfolio diversification strategies receive significant attention, teaching students how to balance risk across different cryptocurrency assets and traditional investments. Dollar-cost averaging, rebalancing techniques, and exit strategies form core curriculum components.

Market psychology and behavioural finance concepts help students understand emotional decision-making pitfalls that commonly affect cryptocurrency investors. This psychological awareness proves crucial for long-term success.

Innovative contract programming receives hands-on treatment through platforms like Ethereum and Solana. Students learn Solidity programming language basics and deploy simple contracts on testnets.

Security considerations receive paramount attention, as smart contract vulnerabilities can result in significant financial losses. Course content includes common attack vectors and defensive programming practices.

Regulatory Compliance and Legal Frameworks

Cryptocurrency regulation continues evolving globally, making compliance education essential for serious practitioners. Courses cover reporting requirements, tax implications, and anti-money laundering (AML) obligations.

Different jurisdictional approaches receive comparative analysis, helping students understand how location affects cryptocurrency legality and taxation. This knowledge proves crucial for international investors and businesses.

Emerging regulatory trends receive regular updates as governments worldwide develop comprehensive cryptocurrency frameworks. Students learn to anticipate regulatory changes and adapt their strategies accordingly.

Key Features to Look for in Cryptocurrency Courses

Instructor Credibility and Experience

Instructor backgrounds significantly impact course quality and practical relevance. Look for educators with demonstrated cryptocurrency experience, whether through successful trading, blockchain development, or academic research.

Industry connections often translate into current market insights and networking opportunities for students. Instructors actively working in cryptocurrency fields bring real-world perspectives that purely academic approaches might miss.

Teaching ability matters as much as subject matter expertise. Effective instructors can explain complex concepts clearly and engage students through varied instructional methods.

Course Content, Currency, and Updates

Cryptocurrency markets evolve rapidly, making content freshness crucial for educational value. Courses should include recent market developments, regulatory changes, and technological innovations.

Regular content updates demonstrate the instructor’s commitment to maintaining educational relevance. Look for courses with recent student reviews mentioning current market conditions and developments.

Version control and update notifications help students stay informed about course improvements and additions. This ongoing maintenance indicates professional course management and instructor dedication.

Practical Applications and Projects

Theoretical knowledge gains value through practical application opportunities. Quality courses include hands-on projects, case studies, and real-world scenarios that reinforce learning objectives.

Portfolio simulation exercises allow students to practice investment strategies without financial risk. These safe learning environments encourage experimentation and learning from mistakes.

Capstone projects often require students to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding through independent research or analysis. These culminating experiences solidify learning and create portfolio pieces for career advancement.

Community Support and Networking

Learning communities enhance educational experiences through peer interaction and collaborative problem-solving. Active discussion forums and study groups provide ongoing support beyond course completion.

Networking opportunities with fellow students and industry professionals can lead to career advancement and business partnerships—many successful cryptocurrency professionals credit educational networking for their career breakthroughs.

Instructor accessibility through office hours, Q&A sessions, and feedback on assignments demonstrates a commitment to student success. This personal attention often distinguishes premium courses from basic offerings.

Certification and Credentialing Options

Industry-Recognized Certifications

Professional certifications add credibility to cryptocurrency knowledge and demonstrate commitment to the field. Organisations like the Blockchain Council and Cryptocurrency Certification Consortium offer standardised credentialing programs.

Certification requirements typically include course completion, examinations, and continuing education obligations. These structured approaches ensure certified professionals maintain current knowledge as the industry evolves.

Employer recognition of cryptocurrency certifications continues growing as blockchain adoption accelerates across industries. Many job postings now specifically mention blockchain certifications as preferred qualifications.

University Partnerships and Academic Credits

University-affiliated courses often provide academic credit options for students seeking formal educational credentials. These programs typically offer more rigorous assessment methods and higher academic standards.

Transfer credit agreements between institutions can help students apply cryptocurrency course credits toward degree programs. This flexibility makes specialised education more accessible to traditional students.

Alum networks from prestigious universities provide valuable networking opportunities and career advancement potential. These connections often prove invaluable for cryptocurrency career development.

Cost Considerations and Value Assessment

Free vs. Paid Course Options

Free cryptocurrency courses provide excellent starting points for beginners exploring the field without financial commitment. However, paid courses typically offer more comprehensive content, instructor support, and credentialing options.

Value assessment should consider learning objectives, career goals, and available time commitments. Free courses work well for casual learners, while serious career changers benefit from comprehensive paid programs.

Subscription models offer access to multiple courses and ongoing content updates. These arrangements provide flexibility while ensuring access to current information as the cryptocurrency landscape evolves.

Return on Investment Analysis

Cryptocurrency education investments should be evaluated against potential career advancement and earning potential. Many professionals report significant salary increases after completing comprehensive blockchain education programs.

Entrepreneurial opportunities in cryptocurrency often require substantial knowledge investments upfront. Quality education can reduce learning curves and increase the success probability for crypto startups and consulting ventures.

Personal investment success improvements can quickly offset educational costs through better decision-making and reduced losses. Many investors report that education prevented costly mistakes that exceeded course fees.

Building Your Cryptocurrency Learning Path

Beginner Learning Progression

New cryptocurrency learners should start with fundamental concepts before progressing to advanced topics. Introductory courses covering Bitcoin, blockchain technology, and wallet security provide essential foundations.

Progressive skill building through increasingly complex courses ensures solid understanding at each level. Rushing through advanced topics without proper foundations often leads to confusion and gaps in knowledge.

Practice exercises and simulations help reinforce theoretical concepts through hands-on experience. Paper trading and testnet experimentation provide safe learning environments for skill development.

Intermediate to Advanced Pathways

Intermediate learners can explore specialised topics like DeFi protocols, NFT markets, and advanced trading strategies. These focused areas allow the development of expertise in specific cryptocurrency sectors.

Advanced learners often benefit from research-oriented courses that examine cutting-edge developments and emerging technologies. Staying ahead of trends requires continuous learning and adaptation.

Teaching opportunities often arise for advanced learners through tutoring, content creation, or course assistance roles. These experiences reinforce learning while building professional networks and credentials.

Success Stories and Career Outcomes

Many professionals have successfully transitioned into cryptocurrency careers through online education. Software developers have moved into blockchain development roles, while finance professionals have joined crypto investment firms.

Entrepreneurial success stories include graduates who launched successful cryptocurrency businesses, trading firms, and consulting practices. Quality education provided the foundation for these ventures and reduced startup risks.

Career advancement within existing organisations often follows completion of cryptocurrency education. Traditional finance firms, technology companies, and consulting practices increasingly value blockchain expertise.

Conclusion

Selecting from the best cryptocurrency courses online in 2025 requires careful consideration of your learning objectives, budget, and time availability. The platforms reviewed in this guide offer diverse approaches to cryptocurrency education, from free introductory content to comprehensive university-level programs with industry-recognised certifications.

The cryptocurrency industry’s continued growth ensures that quality education investments will provide long-term value through career advancement opportunities and improved investment decision-making. Whether you choose Coursera’s academic rigour, Udemy’s practical focus, or Binance Academy’s industry insights, consistent learning and application of concepts will determine your success.

Explore more articles like this

Subscribe to the Finance Redefined newsletter

A weekly toolkit that breaks down the latest DeFi developments, offers sharp analysis, and uncovers new financial opportunities to help you make smart decisions with confidence. Delivered every Friday

By subscribing, you agree to our Terms of Services and Privacy Policy

Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Transforming Finance

Best Cryptocurrency Exchange for Beginners 2025 Complete Guide

Safe Cryptocurrency Investment How to Start in 2025

Amna Aslam

11:01 am

Ethereum Security Settlement Repricing: Beyond the Rollup Narrative

COIN4U IN YOUR SOCIAL FEED

Learn Ethereum security settlement repricing: why markets shift from rollup hype to settlement value, what it means for ETH demand, fees, and adoption. For years, the dominant storyline around Ethereum’s scaling roadmap has been rollup-centric. If you followed crypto research, you likely heard the same refrain: rollups will handle execution, Ethereum will provide data availability and security, and the base layer will become the backbone that anchors an expanding universe of Layer 2 networks. That story wasn’t wrong, but it was incomplete—and markets tend to reprice incomplete stories when the real value proposition becomes clearer. This is where Ethereum security settlement enters the conversation as a powerful lens for understanding why Ethereum may be repriced, not simply as a “rollup hub,” but as a security settlement layer that underwrites trust at internet scale.

Repricing is a market process, not a marketing slogan. It happens when participants update what they believe they are buying. In a rollup-centric phase, many investors primarily valued Ethereum through the lens of throughput, fees, and scaling capacity: how many transactions can Ethereum “handle,” and how cheaply can users transact? But a settlement-centric phase reframes the value question. Instead of focusing on raw execution volume, it emphasizes what Ethereum uniquely sells to the world: credible neutrality, resilient finality, censorship resistance, economic security, and a globally verifiable ledger that others can safely build on. In other words, Ethereum security settlement becomes the product, and execution becomes modular.

Why Ethereum’s Narrative Is Shifting—and Why Markets Care

This shift matters because narratives influence capital allocation. A rollup-centric mindset can produce confusion when fees compress on the base layer or when activity migrates to Layer 2. Critics may conclude Ethereum is “losing revenue” or “outsourcing demand.” A settlement-layer mindset sees the same development differently: the network is scaling by specializing. Ethereum becomes the platform that guarantees security and settlement, while rollups compete in execution, UX, and app-specific customization. Under this model, Ethereum’s value is tied to how much economic activity depends on its security guarantees—how many assets, rollups, institutions, and protocols choose Ethereum as their final arbiter of truth.

In this article, we’ll explain the Ethereum security settlement repricing thesis in detail, clarify what “security settlement layer” means, explore how a rollup-centric worldview differs from a settlement-centric one, and examine the practical implications for ETH demand, fees, staking, and long-term adoption. You’ll also see relevant LSI keywords such as Ethereum settlement layer, rollup-centric scaling, Layer 2 ecosystems, modular blockchain, and Ethereum economic security, integrated naturally to support search visibility.

What “Ethereum Repricing” Means in Plain Terms

Repricing is the market’s way of correcting expectations. When investors misunderstand how value flows through a network, they may overemphasize the wrong metrics. The result is mispricing—either pessimism during transitions or exuberance during hype cycles. The Ethereum security settlement thesis argues that Ethereum’s core value is increasingly understood as security and final settlement, rather than being judged primarily as the place where every transaction is executed.

Rollup-Centric Value: The Old Default

In a rollup-centric framing, Ethereum’s success is often measured by base-layer throughput, transaction counts, and fee revenue directly on L1. This mindset implicitly assumes the “best blockchain” is the one that processes the most activity natively. When rollups reduce L1 execution load, the rollup-centric framing can interpret that as a weakening of Ethereum’s role.

Settlement-Centric Value: The Emerging Lens

In the settlement-centric framing, Ethereum’s success is measured by how much value relies on its security. Even if execution moves off-chain or to Layer 2, Ethereum still benefits if rollups publish data, settle disputes, finalize states, and secure assets via Ethereum’s consensus and economic guarantees. Under this view, Ethereum security settlement becomes more like a global trust engine than a simple transaction processor.

From Rollup-Centric to Security Settlement Layer: What Actually Changes?

Ethereum didn’t suddenly “become” a settlement layer—it always was. What changes is what the market chooses to emphasize. The transition toward Ethereum security settlement repricing becomes obvious when you look at Ethereum’s modular approach: separate execution from settlement, and let specialized layers do what they do best.

Execution Moves, Settlement Stays

Rollups execute transactions elsewhere, then post proofs and/or data back to Ethereum. This means users get cheaper transactions and better UX while still inheriting Ethereum’s security properties—assuming the rollup is designed properly. The settlement guarantee remains anchored to Ethereum, which is precisely why Ethereum security settlement matters more than raw L1 transaction counts.

Security as a Service

A helpful way to understand this shift is to think of Ethereum as “security as a service.” Rollups, token issuers, and even institutions can purchase Ethereum-grade security by aligning their final settlement to Ethereum. When more systems rely on Ethereum’s security and finality, demand for Ethereum blockspace (for data, proofs, and settlement) becomes more structural and less dependent on end-user transaction counts on L1.

Why Rollups Don’t “Steal” Ethereum Value—They Re-route It

A common confusion is that rollups reduce L1 fees, so they must reduce Ethereum’s value. That argument assumes Ethereum’s only product is expensive execution. The Ethereum security settlement thesis flips that assumption: rollups expand the total market that Ethereum can secure, and they create a broader surface area of dependence on Ethereum finality.

Rollups Expand Adoption Without Breaking the Base Layer

Cheaper transactions bring in more users and more applications. While much of that execution happens on L2, the integrity of the system still depends on L1 settlement. The larger the rollup ecosystem becomes, the more Ethereum’s settlement role becomes indispensable, reinforcing Ethereum security settlement value.

Settlement Demand Can Grow Even If L1 “User Transactions” Shrink

If a million users transact on L2, those actions can be compacted into fewer L1 interactions—yet the economic value secured may be higher than before. This is a key reason repricing happens: investors stop counting transactions and start measuring secured value, settlement dependence, and security budget strength. In settlement terms, Ethereum security settlement can become more valuable even with fewer visible L1 user transactions.

The New Valuation Drivers: What Markets May Focus On Next

If Ethereum is being repriced toward Ethereum security settlement, the metrics that matter begin to shift.

Economic Security and the Cost to Attack

A settlement layer’s core promise is that it’s extremely costly to rewrite history. Ethereum’s security is underwritten by a large validator set and staked ETH. As the network’s security budget grows, Ethereum becomes a more attractive final settlement choice. Under the Ethereum security settlement lens, the cost to attack and the credibility of finality are central.

Blockspace as a Scarce Resource

Even in a rollup-heavy world, Ethereum blockspace remains scarce. Rollups compete for data availability, settlement, and proof verification. If demand for these services rises, Ethereum blockspace can remain valuable in a different form than simple retail transactions. The repricing argument is that Ethereum security settlement demand is more structural and institution-friendly.

Settlement Premium and Credible Neutrality

Settlement layers win when neutral parties trust them. Ethereum’s credible neutrality—its resistance to capture by a single actor—is part of why protocols and institutions can rely on it. This “settlement premium” can become a valuation pillar as more real-world value is tokenized and needs a neutral base.

How This Repricing Impacts ETH Demand

A settlement narrative should eventually translate into ETH demand mechanisms. Otherwise it’s just theory. The Ethereum security settlement view suggests several pathways through which ETH remains relevant.

ETH as Security Collateral

Staked ETH is the economic backbone of Ethereum’s settlement assurances. If more systems depend on Ethereum finality, the network’s economic security becomes more important. That can support long-term ETH demand as a security collateral asset.

ETH as the Fee Asset

Even if users transact on L2, many settlement-related interactions ultimately require fees on Ethereum. Rollups pay to publish data and settle state. As rollups scale, this can create baseline demand for Ethereum blockspace and, indirectly, ETH usage—supporting the Ethereum security settlement thesis.

ETH as the Coordination Asset Across Layers

In a multi-layer ecosystem, ETH can serve as a coordinating asset: collateral, liquidity, and settlement alignment across Layer 1 and Layer 2. This coordination role becomes more relevant as the ecosystem expands and becomes more modular.

Rollup-Centric Risks and Settlement-Layer Risks: What Could Undermine the Thesis?

A strong SEO article should also cover risks clearly. Ethereum security settlement repricing is a thesis, not a guarantee.

Risk 1: Rollup Fragmentation and Poor UX

If the user experience across rollups becomes too fragmented—too many bridges, too many fee tokens, too much complexity—adoption may slow. Ethereum can still be a settlement layer, but the ecosystem might struggle to deliver consumer-grade simplicity, weakening the broader growth narrative around Ethereum security settlement.

Risk 2: Alternative Settlement Layers Compete

Other networks can position themselves as settlement layers too. Ethereum’s advantage is security, neutrality, and ecosystem depth, but competition can pressure settlement premiums. The repricing thesis assumes Ethereum remains the most trusted settlement choice for high-value activity.

Risk 3: Fee Compression Without Compensating Demand

If settlement demand does not grow fast enough, and fee markets stay weak, critics may argue Ethereum isn’t capturing value. The settlement-layer view counters that security dependence matters more than short-term fees, but markets can be impatient. This tension is part of why Ethereum security settlement repricing can be volatile.

What This Means for Builders, Investors, and the Broader Ecosystem

The repricing story changes incentives and narratives for different groups.

For Builders: Design for Settlement, Not Just Speed

Builders may prioritize interoperability, proof systems, and safe settlement paths. If Ethereum is the anchor, rollups and apps must design with security inheritance in mind. The clearer Ethereum’s settlement role becomes, the more builders treat Ethereum security settlement as the default trust layer.

For Investors: Evaluate Secured Value, Not Just Transaction Counts

Investors often chase the most visible metric. A settlement thesis encourages deeper evaluation: how much value is secured, how sticky the ecosystem is, and how dependent rollups and tokenized assets are on Ethereum finality. Under this approach, Ethereum security settlement becomes an investment lens rather than a slogan.

For Institutions: A Neutral Final Ledger Is the Product

Institutions typically care about auditability, finality, and trust minimization. A security settlement layer is easier to justify than a consumer transaction chain. This is one reason the Ethereum security settlement narrative can become more dominant as tokenization and on-chain settlement mature.

Signs the Market Is Actually Repricing Ethereum

How can you tell this repricing is happening rather than just being talked about? Look for the narrative shifting in what people measure.

One sign is when analysis focuses less on “Ethereum TPS” and more on settlement dependence: rollup data posting, proof verification activity, growth in L2 ecosystems that still anchor to Ethereum, and increasing discussion of Ethereum’s security budget. Another sign is the tone of discourse: when observers stop saying “rollups are moving activity away from Ethereum” and start saying “rollups are scaling Ethereum’s settlement footprint,” the market is adopting the Ethereum security settlement framework.

Conclusion

Ethereum’s rollup-centric roadmap didn’t diminish Ethereum—it clarified Ethereum. As execution becomes modular and abundant, the most valuable layer becomes the one that guarantees truth. That is the heart of Ethereum security settlement repricing: Ethereum is increasingly valued not as a chain that must do everything, but as the security settlement layer that other systems depend on for finality, neutrality, and economic protection.

If this thesis continues to gain traction, it can reshape how investors judge Ethereum’s success, how builders design applications, and how institutions evaluate on-chain settlement. The rollup era is not a detour; it is the path that makes Ethereum’s settlement role bigger, not smaller. Over time, that shift can drive a repricing that reflects what Ethereum uniquely offers: the strongest shared foundation for securing value on the internet.

FAQs

Q: What does Ethereum security settlement mean in simple terms?

Ethereum security settlement means Ethereum’s main job is to provide strong finality and security guarantees for assets and networks, even if transactions are executed on rollups or other layers.

Q: Why is the market shifting from rollup-centric to settlement-centric thinking?

Because execution is becoming modular and cheaper on Layer 2, while secure final settlement remains scarce and valuable. The settlement layer is what guarantees trust when many systems interact.

Q: Do rollups reduce Ethereum’s value by moving transactions off L1?

Not necessarily. Rollups can expand adoption while still relying on Ethereum for settlement and security. Under the Ethereum security settlement view, that dependence can increase Ethereum’s long-term importance.

Q: What metrics matter most in a security settlement layer model?

Investors often focus on economic security, settlement activity, demand for blockspace related to data and proofs, and how much value depends on Ethereum finality rather than just raw transaction counts.

Q: What could weaken the Ethereum security settlement repricing thesis?

Major risks include poor rollup user experience, strong competition from alternative settlement networks, or settlement demand not growing enough to support the security budget and value capture long term.